Sara McGinnis
posted in Celebrities
Adam Levine isn't in a big hurry to start a family with new wife Behati Prinsloo, but when they are ready he hopes they'll welcome many, many children.
"I think it does change, but in a great way," the 35-year-old singer recently told Ryan Seacrest while talking about being a married man. "You feel like a man or something, it's weird."
"The relationship doesn’t change, but you feel slightly more masculine," he added. "I feel like from a man’s perspective … at the end of the day, if you’re with the right person, the guy is supposed to feel like, I think, a little bit more of a man."
When asked about trying for a baby with the 25-year-old Namibian model, Adam Levine shared, "We're definitely going to do it. I want to have 100 kids. I want to have more kids than would be socially responsible. I don’t know when we're going to do it. We can’t do it right now. I think it’s absolutely in the works for some future date."
Normally I'd argue a socially irresponsible number of kids is partially determined by the number you can financially provide for, but what does one measure against when we're talking about celebrities? Adam Levine's net worth is estimated to be $35 million -- which could by diapers for a whole lot of babies.
For me personally, a responsible number of children is just two. I toyed with the idea of going for baby three for a while, but not only could we not afford it, I have a suspicion my sanity is already maxed out. I'd absolutely love to be a part of a big family, and have some envy over friends who grew up with four and five siblings, but I just don't know that I could be in charge of raising that many myself!
What's a "socially responsible" number of kids for you? How about in the case of a family where money is no object?
Photo: PR Photos
A look at some of Hollywood's leading men who are already dads:
No comments:
Post a Comment